Non-Solicitation Clause

A contractual provision that bars a party from poaching the other side's customers or employees for a set period.

Reviewed by

GC AI Solutions Team

Updated

June 2026

Definition

A non-solicitation clause prohibits a party, most often a departing employee or the seller of a business, from targeting the other side's customers or employees for a defined period after the relationship ends. It comes in two forms: customer non-solicitation, which protects client relationships, and employee non-solicitation, sometimes called a no-poach, which protects the workforce. Because it restricts targeted outreach instead of barring competition outright, it is easier to enforce than a non-compete. Enforceability turns on reasonableness and varies by state, and California broadly prohibits employee non-solicits.

  • Bars a departing employee or seller from soliciting the other side's customers or clients

  • Bars poaching of the other side's employees, often called a no-poach provision

  • Protects client relationships and workforce investment as legitimate business interests

  • Sets the duration and the defined class of off-limits customers or employees

  • Carves out general advertising and responses to unsolicited inquiries from what counts as solicitation

State law has moved against employee non-solicits in particular, with California treating them as void and other states scrutinizing scope and duration more closely.

What It Does

A non-solicitation clause is the protection you reach for when a non-compete is too blunt or unenforceable. It keeps a departing employee from walking out with your client list or your engineering team, while leaving them free to compete in the open market. That narrower aim is why courts enforce it more readily, and why it has become the workhorse restrictive covenant for in-house teams.

When You'll See It

Non-solicitation appears most in employment agreements, executive separation agreements, M&A purchase agreements, and vendor or services contracts where one side gains access to the other's customers or staff. It is frequently paired with confidentiality and, where enforceable, a non-compete. The drafting and the enforceability vary most by state, and California is the sharpest outlier. See also: confidentiality, non-compete, and survival.

Examples

Avnet, Inc.

Executive, Officer Letter Agreement

Customer non-solicit

One-Sided

2022

"directly or indirectly solicit any customer or client of the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries."

Source

SP Plus Corporation

Executive, Executive Severance Agreement

Employee non-solicit · Tiered duration (1 year / 6 months)

One-Sided

2023

"the Eligible Executive shall not directly or indirectly solicit or recruit, or attempt to solicit or recruit, any employee of the Company to leave his or her employment with the Company, nor contact any employee of the Company ... for the purpose of leaving employment with the Company."

Source

Blink Charging Co.

Executive, Employment Agreement

Employee non-solicit · General-solicitation carve-out

One-Sided

2024

"directly or indirectly solicit, recruit, or attempt to solicit or recruit any current employee of the Company to leave their employment with the Company. This non-solicitation obligation does not prohibit you from responding to unsolicited inquiries or from general solicitations that are not directed specifically at customers or employees of the Company."

Source

Vista Outdoor Inc.

Executive, Executive Severance Agreement

Customer non-solicit · Scope-limited to served accounts

One-Sided

2023

"solicit, divert or take away ... the business or patronage of any of the clients, customers or accounts ... which were contacted, solicited or served by the Segment ... at any time during the Executive's employment."

Source

Columbia Banking System, Inc.

Executive, Severance Agreement

Customer and business-relations non-solicit

One-Sided

2024

"solicit or attempt to solicit any customer of the Company or its affiliates to cease doing business with the Company or its affiliates or to otherwise divert such customer's business ... or ... any supplier, licensee, or other business relation."

Source

Cutera, Inc.

Executive, Executive Agreement

Employee and customer non-solicit combined

One-Sided

2023

"(i) solicit or attempt to solicit any employee of the Company to leave the employ of the Company, or (ii) solicit or attempt to solicit any customer, supplier, licensee or other business relation of the Company to transact business with a Competitive Enterprise or to cease doing business with the Company."

Source

Negotiate

- Stops a seller from soliciting or accepting competing offers during an M&A exclusivity period

- Stops a seller from soliciting or accepting competing offers during an M&A exclusivity period

Employer Side

  • Define the off-limits class narrowly enough to be reasonable: customers the person served and employees they worked with.

  • Set a duration courts treat as reasonable, commonly 6 to 12 months, longer only with a strong protectable interest.

  • Anchor the clause to a confidentiality obligation so the customer list qualifies as a trade secret, which supports enforcement even in California.

  • Define "solicit" precisely, and pair it with the confidentiality and, where lawful, non-compete provisions.

If You Are Restricted

If You Are Restricted

Employee or Seller Side

  • Narrow the covered customers to those you had real contact with, and the covered employees to those you supervised or worked alongside.

  • Carve out general job postings, advertising, and responses to unsolicited inbound contact.

  • Push the duration down toward 6 months, and confirm the governing law and your work location keep the clause enforceable.

  • In California, challenge any employee non-solicit, which Business and Professions Code Section 16600 treats as an unlawful restraint.

Red Flags

  • An "any employee" or "all customers" sweep with no link to people the person actually dealt with, which courts often strike as overbroad.

  • No definition of "solicit," leaving it unclear whether a LinkedIn post or an inbound call breaches the clause.

  • An employee non-solicit applied to California workers, which Section 16600 and the 2024 amendment treat as void and which exposes the employer to fee-shifting.

  • A duration far beyond the protectable interest, which invites a court to void or narrow the clause.

  • A customer non-solicit with no underlying confidentiality protection, which weakens the trade-secret basis for enforcement.

FAQs

Related Clauses

Confidentiality

A contractual provision requiring one or both parties to keep specified information secret and use it only for an agreed purpose.

Non-Compete

A contractual provision that restricts a party from competing with the other for a defined time, area, and scope of activity.

Survival

A contractual provision that keeps specified obligations enforceable after the agreement expires or is terminated.

Change of Control

A contractual provision that triggers rights or obligations when one party is acquired or undergoes a change in ownership.

Governing Law

A contractual provision that selects which jurisdiction’s substantive law will be used to interpret and enforce the agreement.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Try GC AI Free

Find Every Gap in Your Non-Solicitation Clause

Trusted by 1,700+ in-house teams

Upload your contract. In 60 seconds, see every missing trigger, weak notice window, and one-sided fee provision, quoted exactly where it appears.

14-day free · No credit card required