Free Class: Building Playbooks in GC AI 106

Live Class

•

75 minutes

•

Hosted by

Solutions Attorney, GC AI

Phil Lamothe

Solutions Attorney, GC AI

Phil Lamothe

Solutions Attorney, GC AI

Brittany Pfister

Solutions Attorney, GC AI

Brittany Pfister

Claim your free spot in an upcoming Building Playbooks in GC AI 106 class by filling out the form below:

Playbooks turn your contract review standards into something your whole team can run.

This 75-minute live class walks you through creating, structuring, and refining a contract review playbook in GC AI. You'll work with real source materials and leave with a clear methodology for building playbooks that produce accurate, actionable results.

Anatomy of a playbook: How descriptions, guides, checks, and positions fit together, and how each component shapes GC AI's review behavior.

Source material strategy: Which documents to feed your playbook and why. Templates, negotiated versions, markups, and internal checklists each play a different role.

Framing fallbacks: How to write fallback positions inclusively so GC AI finds the strongest reasonable position the contract supports, rather than requiring an exact match.

Review and refine: Audit your playbook for ambiguities, contradictions, and missing context using Review Mode and GC AI's Playbook Review process.

Common fixes: What to do when markup is too heavy, fallbacks trigger too early, or the playbook requires context AI doesn't have.

Taught by a GC AI Solutions Attorney who has helped legal teams build playbooks across all major contract types.

This class includes

One 60-minute interactive live session with in-depth lessons and use cases.

Lifetime access to the course replay and materials.

Access to a private community of peers and other GC AI users.

Course certificate upon completion.

A 14-day free pilot of GC AI with usage metrics and analyses.

Why take a legal AI class?

There is a growing gap between legal professionals who understand AI and those who don’t.

Basic prompting skills are the difference between using AI for party planning (fun, not useful) and using it to save hours on a regulatory project or to be able to crank through a vendor MSA in 15 minutes, not 2 hours. Don’t let your team get left behind.

82% of lawyers are now either using or planning to integrate AI into their work (LexisNexis).

Two-thirds of in-house legal teams believe they should be using AI in their work (Thomson Reuters).

A majority of lawyers identified “saving time or increasing efficiency” as the top benefit of using AI (ABA Legal Technology Report).

In general, legal professionals who take this course adopt AI 3 to 5 times faster than those who don’t.